Quixtar - Approved By The FTC?
This is untrue. However, this is what I was told as well. It is important to point out that the FTC does not approve companies in this industry. It regulates them. In fact, the 1979 decision basically stated that Amway was not illegal if it provided (among others) the following:
- Have a Buy-back Rule
- Maintain a 70% Rule
- Enforce a 10 Customer Rule
The '70 percent rule'
provides that '[every] distributor must sell at wholesale and/or retail
at least 70% of the total amount of products he bought during a given
month in order to receive the Performance Bonus due on all products
bought . . ..' This rule prevents the accumulation of inventory at any
level.
The '10 customer' rule
states that '[i]n order to obtain the right to earn Performance Bonuses
on the volume of products sold by him to his sponsored distributors
during a given month, a sponsoring distributor must make not less than
one sale at retail to each of ten different customers that month and
produce proof of such sales to his sponsor and Direct Distributor.'
This rule makes retail selling an essential part of being a distributor.
More complete information can be found in the following:
IN THE MATTER OF Final Order, May 8, 1979
AMWAY CORPORATION, INC., ET AL.
FINAL ORDER, OPINION, ETC., IN REGARD TO ALLEGED
VIOLATION OF THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION ACT
Docket 9023.
Complaint, March 25, 1975
93 F.T.C. 618
Quixtar is a legal business. Quixtar is a sister company of the Amway business. Amway has been around since 1959 and is a legal multilevel business.
Posted by: michael thompson | December 26, 2007 at 09:48 PM
michael thompson....
Yeah, right, and monkeys fly out of my butt.
Posted by: quixtarisacult | April 11, 2008 at 04:17 AM
Bo,
Obviously these selling rules are conveniently disregarded and distributors who are taught to be 'core' and be their own best customer (an insane business strategy to say the least) then are easily allowed to misrepresent that they have followed the FTC rules? Hasn't the FTC basically permitted the continuing fraud that they scrutinized so carefully?
Why then hasn't the FTC correctly stepped in and brought an end to Amway's swindle, all based on exorbitantly priced wares? Why indeed is Amway allowed to maintain their monopoly prices while selling nearly all of their products to those taught to be 100% loyal to Amway goods while excluding negative products from their homes? How can the FTC be so inept as to allow the very scheme they sought to close down to continue to operate outside of their own regulations, ones which if they took the time to investigate would provide the smoking gun?
Just as the FEC allowed Bernie Madoff to continue his Ponzi Scheme for years after they were straightforwardly informed by Harry Markopolis of the exact nature of his fraud? Why then is the FTC taking a page out of the FEC inept playbook and allowing Amway to continue fleecing the 'little guy investors' in Amway's Enron-like closed market swindle?
More importantly, does the Obama Administration care that this type of swindle is being carried to the Chinese, or the world's largest democracy: India?
Posted by: quixtarisacult | March 12, 2009 at 02:31 PM